I am not sure I am parsing your argument correctly, but it sort of sounds like you are claiming this debt came from the previous owners, who are somehow getting away with this scott free? As far as I know, Twitter's current debt issues are actually entirely due to Musk: he didn't buy the site with $44b of his own cash but borrowed a ton of money from banks that I guess were stupid enough to think he's rapidly turn it into a profit center, and so now the site has been suddenly hit with $13b in debt.