Basically, having universal or near-universal access to modern sanitation is the "program". If you're not in a community that has this, being a member of Doctors Without Borders is insufficient as a guard against getting infected. Conversely, having running water and flush toilets as the norm makes it far less likely for dieases like ebola to spread even among non-members of Doctors Without Borders.

So, while "lack of education" is not the right diagnosis here, lack of basic amenities certainly is.

That's entirely disingenuous, and you know it. There's a huge difference between the uneducated public in the developing world (or, clearly, everywhere really) and those that choose to enter into those challenging conditions to try and help people.

They should have had worked harder in schools. I thought the message was out by this point