I thought this case was just one more of many, that had all gone this same way. What exactly is supposed to make this case different?
These SEC rules are a big part of the reason why NFTs took off: those were clearly not securities according to the rules.
The LBRY token was sold the same way every ICO pump-and-dump of 2018 went, but LBRY actually used those proceeds to figure out how to build an okay product. The rules were published. They didn't follow them.
The precedents being set with these cases will have an enormous ripple effect on crypto and web3 companies.