undefined | Better HN

0 pointsthesuperbigfrog3y ago0 comments

>> Shell would benefit from Content-Type/Accept headers. Like you can specify that cat accepts text and jq accepts Json. Then `ip a` would output corresponding type automatically.

That seems unnecessary. Traditionally, shells have always used text streams. JSON is just text that follows a given convention. Couldn't what you are describing be implemented by setting environment variables or using command line flags?

For example:

PREFERRED_OUTPUT_FORMAT="JSON"

--output-format="JSON"

--input-format="JSON"

Tools that can generate and consume structured text formats are a good idea, but they should be flexible enough that they can even work with other tools that have not been written yet.

"This is the Unix philosophy: Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface." --Doug McIlroy

0 comments

vbezhenar3y ago

I don't follow. JSON is not really readable. I don't want to see JSON output ever except for script debugging. I want to see well formatted output. But at the same time I want to be able to write something like

  ip a | filter "[].address like 192.*"

So when I'm typing `ip a` I expect to get output for human and when I'm piping it to `filter` program, I expect for those programs to exchange with JSON (and ideally `filter` should use some tabular formatting as its human-readable output).

You suggesting that I should write `PREFERRED_OUTPUT_FORMAT=JSON ip a | filter "[].address like 192.*"` but that's really verbose and error-prone. It might work for scripts, but for ad-hoc shell I don't like this approach. Ideally programs should be able to communicate between pipes for their preferred formats.

thesuperbigfrogOP3y ago

I was saying that Accept Headers or "format negotiation" concepts that are typically used in client-server communications are a bit overkill for command line tools and shell pipelines.

I agree that human-readable text formats should be the default output formats for command line tools, but that easy-to-parse structured text output formats should be easy to specify with either environment variables or command line flags.

If I am writing a script and I am using tools that support a given structured output format and use environment variables or command line flags for output configuration it could work something like this:

    #!/bin/env script-interpreter
    export PREFERRED_OUTPUT_FORMAT="JSON"
    query-cli-tool | filter-cli-tool --output-format=json | combinator-cli-tool --input-format=json | pretty-formatter-tool > output_file

This would mean that the command line tools default to human-readable formats, but can still generate JSON or some other structured text format when configured to do so.

bonzini3y ago

FWIW ip already has JSON support:

    ip -j a s | jq 'map(select((.addr_info | .[].local)|startswith("192.168."))) | map(.ifname)'

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse