There are a few interfaces that were introduced in Linux, OpenBSD, NetBSD etc. that saw subsequent broad adoption across all of modern Unix-like OSs, FreeBSD included.
For whatever reason, Linus or the distributions themselves arbitrarily deviated from the ways common in all UNIX, in directory structure and tools and other details, that in one sense they are still similar, brothers even, but in another they are entirely different, and distant cousins removed several times, and, again, I believe these deviations were entirely arbitrary, and as such, unnecessary.
/rant, nothing personal, everyone considers Linux as UNIX, and they're not entirely wrong, but the differences are neither minor nor pedantic, and I, for one, wish it had been different and Linus or GNU or distros had not made these unnecessary deviations from standard UNIX and continued to do so, as the advantages of the deviations, if there are any, are negligible. To me they seem different for the sake of being different, unnecessarily adding complexity to an already complex matter.
And I acknowledge that Linus may be entirely innocent and the problem may have always been with GNU, I'm just not certain who the culprits are, but they seem to have made the mistake of changing the architecture without being aware of what came before, falling into the tragedy of reinventing wheels.
I also said OpenBSD and NetBSD, but this seemed to escape your multi paragraph rant.
Also worth noting that FreeBSD, while technically derived from Unix in a way that Linux cannot claim, still today cannot use the Unix trademark.
