I don't think this invalidates the point or makes it not problematic that they host this content without any disclaimer. It would be extremely easy in many contexts to pass this off as being officially endorsed and on some level, regardless of the specifics, I'd call hosting it on their website some degree of implicit endorsement.
If it said something really terrible or unPC, do you think they'd leave it up just because "having it on the site isn't an official endorsement"?
Id bet my bottom dollar there are people passing these .gov links around on shitty facebook groups and saying, "look, even the NIH admits chakras are real"
At a minimum, they don't do anything to disabuse that notion like a header saying "we don't endorse everything we host" which seems like a reasonable first step.
