undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbryan03y ago0 comments

Thanks. That explanation on avoiding selection bias makes sense, but it seems like the study is saying those who choose to get a colonoscopy (whether invited or not) are 50% less likely to die of colon cancer.

Also I’m not sure if the article mentioned this, but the data seems to imply that the % of people who opted to get a colonoscopy was similar in the invited and control group.

0 comments

akvadrako3y ago

That suggests something strange though – that those who were invited but non-tested were more likely to die of colon cancer than non-invitie non-testers.

zerocrates3y ago

I suppose that by refusing to get a colonoscopy even when specifically prompted to do so, you're maybe sorting yourself into a more "unhealthy" group than the general population of non-colonoscopy-havers.

robertlagrant3y ago

That would make the outcome less surprising.

bluGill3y ago

It would be unethical to refuse to invite someone with a family history of colon cancer. Thus I think it is perfectly reasonable to assume there is something different.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse