That would depend upon the hash being attacked, and the willingness of an attacker to apply money to the problem.
This 8 GPU cracking rig: https://gist.github.com/epixoip/a83d38f412b4737e99bbef804a27...
Speeds along at, among others, 104.2 GH/s attacking Skype hashes, 200.1 GH/s attacking PostgreSQL's hashes, 414.4 GH/s attacking MySQL323 hashes (if those are even present in the wild anymore) and 334.0 GH/s attacking NTLM hashes. Two to Four hundred Giga hashes per second is a lot of trials, and one would necessarily need to had a number of words to make up for that performance.
> and if the hashing method used a combination of BCrypt+sha512crypt.
The 8GPU cluster states 105.7kH/s for bcrypt and 1168.6kH/s for sha512crypt. Fewer words would be needed to be secure /if/ those algorithms were used. But, as has been seen time and again, not all sites storing password hashes use the better hashes.