What is shocking is that "trusted news" claimed this wasn't true just last year. You'd think the vaccine cured cancer with just how perfect the news portrayed it to be.
Without delving into conspiracy theory it does certainly seem like 2020-2021 was the greatest period of sponsored, deliberate, misinformation spread by previously trustable sources in history. The level of irresponsibility with such an important thing to society (vaccines) will likely forever drive people away from taking them. The irony of all this is the misinformation peddlers seem to have actually been the news with their by-the-minute update on "debunking anti-vaccine claims". Certainly many anti-vaccine claims are far-fetched. But, the less far-fetched ones seem to be coming true by the day.
Will we see vaccine providers and news agencies in court for deliberately misleading the public? Signs point to unlikely. Maybe it'll make an interesting documentary our grandchildren will watch, though.
Is it most? Flu, pertussis, hepatitis are all recommended during pregnancy. Is it a live vs inactive distinction?
[1] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/vaccines-during-p...
With the way censorship is going, our grandchildren will be reading the "corrected" version of this, at best.
> The method (eSupplement) states the study was conduce between February and October 2020. That surprises me because the vaccinations being studied were not available to the public for that entire period. The first dose outside a clinical trial was given in Queens, New York on December 14 that year. Before this, they were only available as part of trials which excluded lactating individuals.
> The Supplement section of the letter states that the study was conducted from February to October 2020. The year reported was an error; the study was conducted in 2021. The Journal is in the process of correcting this error.
> This study investigated whether the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA can be detected in the expressed breast milk (EBM) of lactating individuals receiving the vaccination within 6 months after delivery.
Perhaps my English is bad, but IIUC the abstract makes the question if there is mRNA from the vaccine after 6 months, but it does not answer it. I can't find a good article about that https://www.google.com/search?q=mrna+vaccine+degradation+rat... but my guess is a few days. I'll be very surprised it survives a month inside the body.
> Perhaps my English is bad,
Now I think I misunderstood this part. It's 6 months after "delivering" the children, not 6 months after "delivering" the vaccine.
