> That’s nice, but it just highlights that the coding style isn’t sufficiently intelligible by itself. We can’t and shouldn’t rely on a static analyzer to be active to make code intelligible everywhere code is displayed (pull requests, diffs, ...).
Yes, we absolutely should rely on that.
Why would programmers, who are basically tool-builders, reject tools that help us write and analyze our programs? This is not the 1970s, and bare-bones text editors are not the only option. Why should we, who build tools for others, restrict ourselves to a self-imposed unreasonable simplicity?
You are free to use Vi or whatever, but don't complain when everyone else uses better tools to improve their productivity, and if the code they write is better suited for those tools that is perfectly fine.