And so now I'm supposed to believe BMW is all-in on EVs? Meh, as much as we like our BMW motorcycles, I think we're just going to pass on BMW for now, as much as we might lust after the EV M version. Convince us you're committed, BMW, and we can talk again in a few years.
Agree on Nissan though. The leaf used to be the only cheapish EV available in the USA but Chevys newer products and prices look far more competitive
And the follow up versions could have improved, that is what many internally at BMW expected. They wanted the next evolution of all their major cars to go EV.
However management pulled the rug from that and basically said the next full product cycle is gone be mostly ICE with some PHEV and very little pure electric.
So they went from a company who was transitioning to EV rapitly, to a company that focused on a strategy of 'everything' meaning architectures that are ICE, PHEV, HEV, even hydrogen and electric.
As for Nissan, I'm with you on Chevy's competition. But I was on about how they were the first modern manufacturer of mass-produced BEVs and eleven years later...they still have just the one model that sits on the low-end. And as you point out, that singular model's lunch is probably getting eaten by Chevy Bolts.
The i3’s price (and especially looks) we’re problems, but they absolutely could have had a strong contender years ahead of other legacy auto makers.
I wish more people would call them out on their hypocritical bullshit but they continue to successfully coast on their friendly “cool Japan” _kaizen_ reputation while quietly dragging us out the back to slit our throats.
If a Tesla's battery had the same energy density as gasoline, it would have a range of roughly 30,000 miles. Then again, the Tesla battery weighs as much as 200 gallons of gasoline.
This leaves so much room for gains in the BEV market as battery technology improves. One day they will look at current model Teslas the same way we look at Nissan Leafs from the 2010s with a 30-40 mile range.
Edit: 2000s -> 2010s Dear god
then the numbers become more realistic.
https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/global/article/detail/T040330...
These hydrogen cars are mostly fantasy, good for marketing and have essentially no adoption at all.
Toyota has had a hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle lease program in southern california for at least 5 years, but, to your point, adoption is constrained because hydrogen fueling infrastructure was purpose built to test the idea, and so is not at all widely available.
Source: https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/12/23204950/bmw-subscription...
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a39983612/2022-bmw-ix-test...
They say the US is mandating 80% of original range after 10 years. Maybe they'll tack a right to repair/upgrade clause in there too.
CATL is the supplier they use though, and they intend to deliver this 2 years before BMW.
All the low carbon and recycling stuff is great, but overall feels super weak and late to the game.