undefined | Better HN

0 pointsArnt3y ago0 comments

Could you describe what the west should do instead, a little more specifically?

There isn't a war, according to one of the combatants, so "ending the war" is a too vague. What does "end the war" mean when one of the combatants claims that there is no war? I think it's better to discuss how to end one the nasty results, and I chose the deportations of children. Not for any particular reason, just because it's of the concrete things we all want to stop.

The Russians have deported a staggering number of children (almost as many children as live in Berlin), both from areas near the frontline and areas far from it. Could you describe what the west might to do to stop those deportations? Something more effective than delivering weapons?

0 comments

sschueller3y ago

Cease-fire and dialog to resolve conflicts. Willingness to make reasonable consetions and pow exchanges.

rasz3y ago

Ok, so US forces Ukraine to cease fire - thy just stand around and get killed by Russian daily Kalibr airstrikes. What did that solve exactly?

ArntOP3y ago

Uhm, wouldn't the Ukrainians need a hundred thousand POWs first in order to exchange them for the deported children?

88840-88553y ago

Deported children? You mean the same children that Saddam has killed back then and that the US used as a reason to bomb millions into oblivion... and that was a fake in the end? :)

No thanks, American lies and propaganda must be banned + people spreading it must be punished.

trasz3y ago

That war has already ended. US wasn't punished, because it's a superpower. There is no reason not to punish Russia.

_kbh_3y ago

He is likely talking about the genocide that Russian regularly commits against Ukraine. Russia has forcibly deported hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians to Russia and that includes a large number of children.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse