In an ideal world, where everyone votes sincerely (and using an agreed-on scale), sure.

But that's not the real world: here people are declaring a whole season of a show either a 10 or 1, after _maybe_ seeing 25% of it.

In other words, this data is too noisy and so not trustworthy.

Kind of like video game reviewers are experts lol. The problem with the do called experts is that often they have a strong financial incentive to give high marks to expensive ips. So if Amazon spent 500m for the show buying some critics for 5m total seems trivial