A report to the ULD will also most likely only result in a slap on the wrist.
I actually did them a favor by pointing out their problems, because some german law firms use crawlers to detect GDPR and other violations. They then send cease-and-desist orders and collect expensive legal fees for that.
we just launched the first public beta of Typeform open-source tool snoopForms.
Apart from OS, we want to differentiate by:
- offering code & no-code interfaces to create forms (beta) - offering in-depth form analytics & improvement tools like A/B testing (tba) - granular and conditional data piping i.e. "if newsletter checkbox is set, send name & email field to SendGrid". Essentially, well integrated and GDPR compliant Zapier
What do you think?
What stops some spammer from ramming the bill?
We thought that with a form you always try to get as much information as possible, hence your "snooping" around.
You took it a step further, good that extensive form analytics are coming :)
Change the name.
$0.02 per submission can get very expensive very fast. For 10,000 submissions, it will cost the user $200 where as Typeform costs $83 for the same[1]. Is it really that expensive to store 10,000 rows of data?
I understand the other features provided with the storage such as analytics and integrations but it still doesn't justify the cost imo.
While you can argue that you offer self-hosting as well and as someone who is a big fan of self-hosting(I self-host over 8+ apps[2]), It's another thing I can self-host if I need to someday and I thank you for making it self-hostable/open-source. But from my experience, only very technical users self-host apps.
[1] https://www.typeform.com/pricing/
[2] https://vikashbajaj.substack.com/p/the-slippery-slope-of-sel...
[1] https://vikashbajaj.substack.com/p/the-slippery-slope-of-sel...
Your submission-based pricing is also very approachable to small-volume forms -- the industry standard is about a $25-35 minimum monthly, and even though there's often a free tier it usually includes a small subset of features.
One thing that's a blocker for me at the moment is that I can't seem to add text besides the field name to a field in the no-code tool. It's useful for providing instructions on the field, but I don't see a way to do it.
Overall this feels pretty polished, I'm impressed.
> investigate or look around furtively in an attempt to find out something, especially information about someone's private affairs.
I run a coaching business and I’d like my students to be able to submit their work for feedback and review. Then if they need to make changes, I’d like to make it as easy as possible for them to resubmit the form with tweaks to their submission.
