If you run a website, what percentage of uses click 'Accept All' and what percentage click 'Reject All'?
Not sure how well it worked but it was satisfying.
Also, if your popup says "we care about your privacy" please remove that lie. If you cared about my privacy you wouldn't track me.
The preferences of the crowd here are largely irrelevant, as the people that frequent this website are typically not average web users.
Don’t quote me. Do your own research.
Too often 'reject all' doesn't do what it leads you to believe. I don't have incentive to allow any of it
Edit: It's often a ruse anyway. Either changing nothing or not working until you reload, if I remember correctly
I always click Accept All to make it go away, if I didn't have the uBlock filter that blocks the popups altogether.
My point is that an "accept all" reflex isn't necessarily safe even if you don't retain cookies.
Things like “rights to your first born” are illegal and unenforceable.
“you must visit the site everyday from now on” is unenforceable.
“or we close your account” - they don’t need your consent for that
Accept generally works better, sometimes you get more crap when you reject. Oftentimes you can't even find reject very easily
I have noticed that the quality of material I read has gone up in the process.
Most of the time, I click the first thing that comes up. However, I have noticed that this only happens on trusted sites.
On sites I don't know, I prefer to either close the window or "reject all." But how it pisses me off!
It helpfully removes both the popup and the tracking.
