Learn Emacs: Keyboard Macros (opens in new tab)

   M-x replace-regexp
      Replace regexp: test\(.+\)
      Replace regexp with test\#

   M-x replace-regexp
      Replace regexp: test\(.+\)
      Replace regexp with test\,(1+ \#\)

   M-x replace-regexp
      Replace regexp: test\(.+\)
      Replace regexp with test\,(aref ["one", "two", "three"] (mod \# 3))

Anyway, all of this was basically stolen from Steve Yegge. You should totally go read his article if you're interested: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/06/shiny-and-new-emacs-...

http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/KeyboardMacrosTricks

From there:

    If you want to produce this list:

    test1
    test2
    test3
    ...

    Do like this:

    C-x r n q           (store the number 1 in register q)
    C-x (               (start macro recording)
    test C-x r i q      (insert contents of register q)
    C-x r + q           (increment register q by 1)
    RET                 (new line)
    C-x )               (stop macro recording)

For your example, I write this:

    vars = list('abcdefghijklm')
    for v,i in zip(vars, range(len(vars))):
        print("#define {} {}".format(v, i))

    #define a 0
    #define b 1
    #define c 2
    #define d 3
    #define e 4
    #define f 5
    #define g 6
    #define h 7
    #define i 8
    #define j 9
    #define k 10
    #define l 11
    #define m 12

My lisp-fu isn't good enough to implement this today, but I would find it really easy to:

* copy `#define a 0` with C-k, M-w, C-y, RET, C-y, RET, C-y, RET, ... (so copy the line and paste N times)

* begin interactive search-and-replace, with usual keybindings (Y for replace, N for skip, . for replace and stop)

* but with additional keybinding, e.g. + for change replacement and apply

Alternatively, the replace argument in M-% would be a [somehow-delimited] list of replacements, and + or capital Y would pop off the next replacement and begin using that.

[1] http://www.gnu.org/s/libtool/manual/emacs/Keyboard-Macro-Cou...

[2]http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1509688/emacs-macro-to-ge...

Here's what I'd do for your example, starting in an empty buffer:

abcdefghijklm C-a C-SPC C-e C-w <F3> #define SPC C-y M-b C-f C-SPC C-e C-w SPC <F3> RET <F4>

Then press F4 until you reach `m'. (You may find that the sequence ends with `m' being 12.)

(NOTE you should totally use `enum' for this; your debugger may on occasion permit you to use the names when you are entering an expression, and you'll get sensible error messages in the event of a conflict. Unlikely in this case I suppose since nobody uses variables called `i' or `j'.)

I'll fill one buffer with the text I'm editing, and the other buffer with any 'arguments'. Then I'll just write the macro to switch between buffers and grab arguments as necessary.

The documentation for the most convenient way to do it (there are others) is at:

http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Key...

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

and then using copy rectangle I can quickly assemble long lists of numbers.

I do use keyboard macros quite frequently too, but mostly for more complex operations (e.g. start of line, search for char, set point, search for next char, kill-ring-save, move to end, set point, yank, uppercase region)

I am going to echo a reply elsewhere on this thread and say you should contribute to the emacswiki if you can as well.

Or more generally: repetitive structure in any text file (especially a program) is generally a sign of bad design, and should be factored out in whatever way is appropriate.

The issue isn't a lack of information built-in--Emacs is self-documenting, after all--but that its difficult to prioritize features. The real value in blog posts like this is when they describe features the author really likes coupled with his actual use cases for it.

Ultimately, the author is just a curator in a special Emacs exhibit--he brings out the real gems (from his point of view) and gives us some background on them. I think something like that could be integrated into Emacs--but should it?--by having a "tip of the week" or something like that.