Skip to content
Better HN
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Search
⌘K
undefined | Better HN
story
0 points
CamperBob2
3y ago
0 comments
Share
That was a stupid order that would never survive scrutiny under prior-restraint doctrine. Specific performance is something different, though... I can't think of any constitutional problems that might block enforcement of that.
0 comments
default
newest
oldest
rurp
3y ago
Musk and his lawyers agreed to the provision, and a court approved the deal. That is pretty strong evidence it's not an absurd provision.
CamperBob2
OP
3y ago
He has also violated it multiple times, with no sign of any consequences. That is pretty strong evidence that it was, at best, pointless.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse