At this point the V community is verging on self parody. I can’t think of a more illustrative example of a victim complex.

Unfortunately it’s very hard to convince self-proclaimed victims that they are not in fact victims, because then you become one of the “detractors” or “competitors” looking to “gaslight” and “slander”.

I’ve never seen a language with so much self-inflicted drama around it.

Your attempts at gaslighting won't work. The OP appears to have created a throwaway account for the purposes of recommending to not use V and then to be used as a linked reference document for further attacks by competitors and detractors, as has already happened on various other internet sites, including here. This is also a pattern of attack on the language, used previously by other detractors, including here and on the OP's "evaluation".

And there is more:

1) The OP does not mention he is evaluating an alpha version of the language.

2) OP starts the "evaluation" with a link to a very contentious and controversial post from 2019, which smears the author and describes the language as vaporware (despite it being 2022 now and over 100 releases later).

3) At no time during the creation of his supposedly month long "evaluation" did the OP reach out to the V developers or community to verify anything in his report.

4) At no time did the OP demonstrate any good will by filing any bug reports or creating a discussion at V's GitHub. He had a unknown throwaway GitHub account, to easily do such.

5) The OP's "evaluation" summary (that can not be responded to) is full of opinions that are subject to interpretation.

6) Exactly how qualified is this mystery evaluator doing this negative review? Unknown.

7) Multiple times in the review, the OP mentions "we", as if he is part of a team. Who is "we"? Unknown.

8) The OP avoids attempts to be engaged in debate with V developers on various points about his review or make it known that he will modify it for correctness, fairness, or language version.