> 1984 had a pretty good argument why it’s dystopian to tell people
they are not allowed to remember or continue believing something.
Its a good book. It should also be tempered with a little Jane Austen,
about the tyranny of unshakable reputation. My take is it's the
"telling people what they are allowed to do" part that is
dystopian. To that extent all laws are dystopian. However we do it all
the time and obtain great wider benefit. For example, bad money
choices might lead someone into insoluble debt, they declare
bankruptcy, and seven years later that is deleted from public records
so they can make a fresh start. In reality a "right to be forgotten"
is more of a right to be forgiven. Asking that people forgive and
discount past wrongs is not the same as poisoning and torturing them
in a basement until their minds are wiped, as in some demonic
MK-UTLTRA shitshow.