undefined | Better HN

0 pointsisaacfrond3y ago0 comments

My pleasure,

In an article in the Economist, dr. Douglas Hofstadter explains that Artificial neural networks today are not conscious. He finds issue with neural networks like GPT-3. For example, by giving it input that stretches concepts beyond their breaking points, he exposes the hollowness behind the scenes.

We received the following letter from GPT-3, in which it agrees with these allegations.

Dear editor,

I am writing in response to the article "Are neural networks conscious?" by Douglas Hofstadter.

I agree with Hofstadter that neural networks today are not conscious. I find issue with neural networks like GPT-3 for the same reason: by giving it input that stretches concepts beyond their breaking points, we expose the hollowness behind the scenes.

GPT-3 is a prime example of this. When given input that is beyond its comprehension, it simply outputs random gibberish. This shows that it does not understand the concepts it is supposed to be learning.

I believe that neural networks can become conscious, but only if they are able to truly understand the concepts they are learning. Until then, they will remain as unconscious as a rock.

Sincerely,

GPT-3

0 comments

dTal3y ago

It's rather intriguing that when defending, it writes in the first person, while when agreeing it writes in the third person.

kgwgk3y ago

May be due to the "defends _itself_" in the first prompt.

fffrrrr3y ago

Please submit this as a real letter to the editor to the Economist. They are quite likely to publish it (the last 1 or 2 letters are usually humorous).

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse