1) I would really like the "hand" mode to be the default. It took me a while to figure out I could change it.
2) I would like an easy way to load the whole picture in my browser at full resolution so that I can scroll horizontally at will.
3) Related, one approach to 2 that I've done on another site is to automatically resize the picture to the maximum height of the user's browser when they go in view full screen mode.
I agree. Auto scroll combined with hover scroll is giving me a headache.
There should also be a way to get the image to hold still when using the hand mode.
Anyway, thank for your suggestions!
It's a commonly accepted UI paradigm that the mouse needs to be 'engaged' (via a button press) in order to have a functional effect on the UI. In the non-engaged mode mouse is only used for indicating otherwise actionable UI elements.
Good luck.
http://panoye.blogspot.com/2008/02/tutorial-panoramic-photos...
in this photo there are 5 or 6 vertical slices of photo. http://www.flickr.com/photos/orionlogic/2456850403/sizes/l/
Now some observations:
- It's hard to tell who posted a panorama - the only information about the user is their image
- Is each person's rating posted as a comment? This could be problematic if hundreds of people end up rating a panorama
- I'm not too sure your permalink structure is good for the long run (using folders, categorization will make it easier for search traffic to find more content)
These are just my observations, please take them lightly. Like I said, the site is nice overall and can be a useful utility for those interested in panoramas.
Best of luck!
Permalinks are a problem, I agree. I would, for example, like to have links like panoye.com/country/city/panorama-name.html but the problem is with google maps. When you signup for your gmap key - you have ONE key for ONE directory on the web server (for example country/city/). It means that I should have (and use) houndreds of gmap API keys :(
Thank you again for your comment!
Right :) In fact this is why it is an "app", not a "startup". I have no idea on how to bring it the masses and/or how to make some money from it.
It is still a hobby project and it will probably remain so.
Second: I wanted to turn back three times before I created an account because:
1. Why should I have to create an account just to upload a picture? I don't care about people knowing who took the picture, especially since I only have a couple panoramas. Give people the choice of creating an account or uploading anonymously.
2. You want my email? Why would you need this?
3. You emailed me an auto-generated password. Seriously? People will either forget the password and keep doing password recovery or searching through their email for the password or immediately change this to whatever password they usually use on the internet. There is no sensitive information on this site, there's no sense getting in somebody's way and making it a multi-step process for your users to use the password they want to use.
Third: The map on the upload panorama page needs to let me search for locations. I know the name of the place that I took the picture at, why are you making me find it manually?
Fourth: If you screw up orienting the picture (the < 6 deg. error) then you can't get past it and have to re-upload the image. Give me a "start over" button for orienting. Also, I think I oriented the wrong direction because it's telling me that Epcot in Orlando, FL is north of Gainesville, FL, but it's actually south. Either I screwed up or your direction finding is wrong.
In a similar vein, the Google map shown to the right of a panorama, should (be able to) locate all the other panoramas too, for the same reason of being able to see what else is nearby.
Anyway, I really live it. It is really stunning and amazing. But, you should at least let users know how to upload their panoramas. Put a big "Upload" button in your frontpage.
Great work though! Still looking through it.
On the whole, I think it's a brilliant idea, and at least to my knowledge, isn't being repeated anywhere else. That said, I'd focus on layout and design, and accentuate the social aspects of the site where I could.