No, that's not it, that's a very uncharitable interpretation and is unnecessarily dismissive . The real issue is that no one wants to pay for studies to turn off-label uses to on-label uses if there isn't money in it because the process is expensive, and so won't be done when there are better returns on investment.
There is plenty of peer reviewed research, but not all doctors are aware of all research and testosterone replacement is widely marketed with very lucrative contracts to urologists.
Feel free to read the research yourself
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=Clomiphene+testostero...
The FDA has a "new clinical investigation" program that is supposed to reward people running clinical trials. If you collect data showing efficacy of a new use of a previously-approved drug, you can "earn" the exclusive right to market it for that condition. Of course, someone has to actually do it...and the numbers don't always pan out.
For example, who would fund more studies on ginger? https://nutritionfacts.org/video/ginger-for-migraines/