EDIT: I made a typo on my phone and originally incorrectly wrote "advocating for Roe v Wade".
I think USA was the only part of the anglosphere to not go all-out on vax mandates. Certain types will chalk all of that up to "muh guns" or "muh constitution," and perhaps they are right, or maybe there was just a pesky little piece of case law in the way, and the system is removing the obstacle before round-two commences?
Edit: Also from what I can see, he's not actually a member of WEF, he just gives talks there.
They rely on that poverty of discourse for validity and probably find disagreement, debate and the constant tension of these questions to be irritating and they want it to end, so their propositions simply assume a position on these things then assert some moralistic or otherwise utopian vision of plenty to be derived from them at some undefined point in the future. This is what irrational and religious people do in order to justify their own power, because ultimately that's what really matters to them.