undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdragontamer4y ago0 comments

> How about the obvious fact that Twitter is not currently worth $54.20/share?

Shame on Musk for writing $54.20 into the contract then.

Just because the value of something changed after you wrote the contract doesn't mean that you can break the contract unilaterally. Musk could have gotten around this with an all-stock deal (ex: I'll give the Twitter board 100,000 shares of TSLA or whatever), or other ways to write the contract without setting a particular dollar amount.

But Musk wrote $54.20 and signed it.

And the contract even says the Twitter Board can force Elon Musk to buy Twitter and finish the deal at $54.20. So they made it crystal clear to Musk (and his lawyers) that the $54.20 price points stays, no matter how Twitter's price changes over the next weeks.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

HWR_144y ago· 2 in thread

But 54.20 ends in 420, which means weed. Musk loves to memelord.

I think offering a direct swap for his TSLA shares at 20:1 would have been a smart move. It would have cost him like 5% of TSLA, which is a lot but still would have left him with the same % that Bezos has of AMZN

myko4y ago

TSLA is way over valued at the moment. That would be a big risk compared to cash in hand.

HWR_144y ago

To accept it, yes. But it avoids the macroeconomic questions and would have been a good idea for Musk to offer

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse