If there is a further good faith interpretation of what you've said you'd like added to the conversation then please point it out here and lead by example. Only pointing out you think the other person should have better respected the good faith doesn't serve to help anybody understand better, in fact it goes against the principle itself.
As it stands the most solid interpretation I can come up with is still that raw SSD pricing for a consumer, even though higher than listed, can come out low enough to be less than a percentage of revenue for YouTube but this still holds no indication about storage costs actually being that low but I'm always open to stronger interpretations!
- You claimed that the numbers I referenced were based on a clear scam. The resource is in fact the first resource you will find if you google "per tb storage cost".
- You stated that I had made oversights about total cost, something I never referred to.
- You claimed without any reference that the numbers I mentioned were off by multiple orders of magnitude.
- You said I'm "hellbent on saying this half billion/year doesn't matter". I made no such statement and don't feel that way at all.
- You said I was wrong about the way peering agreements are priced between ISPs and Google, but offered no other insight other than just saying I'm wrong.
- You just called me reactionary.
Again, I think it would be beneficial if you would respect the people you're interacting with enough to at least have a more constructive discussion.
