This rigid, dogmatic, exclusionary point of view is antithetical to the scientific process. No conclusion is beyond skepticism, especially regarding the safety and efficacy of a rushed novel biotechnology. What you're preaching is not science, it's scientism.

Furthermore, skepticism regarding the covid mRNA vaccines does not make one an antivaxxer. That's a lazy rhetorical dismissal, not an actual argument. All vaccines go through trials and most fail either for poor safety, efficacy, or both. mRNA vaccines are no different, except typical protocols were suspended because of a crisis. Skepticism is warranted.

/r/COVID19 typically enforces the same rigid dogma in your post. The kind of rigidness that saw this submission flagged here within 5 minutes of submission. That's a bias that detracts from credibility, to put it mildly.