undefined | Better HN

0 pointsalgo_trader3y ago0 comments

> around ~70% of the cost of solar installation is soft costs

This is incorrect, especially for solar farms

Panels are indeed only about 1/3 of the cost. Additional components, labour, inverter, mounting - another 1/3.

The last third is indeed soft(ish) cost, but this includes profit (duh..), certification, survey, tax, fees, etc. This can be reduced, but it is not going to magically disappear ...

Another fun fact : newer mega farms in low-altitude deserts are considering no-axis no-mounting zero-tilt - just laying the panels on the ground ... It all comes down to cost vs yield

A nice project by the way. Did you ever compare the results to pre-calculated angles based on time/location/season?

0 comments

ncmncm3y ago

Farmers are placing them mounted vertically, like fences, in productive fields, running north/south, far enough apart to run a tractor between. They pick up power in morning and afternoon. The crops benefit from reduced heat stress and water loss, and yield more.

Panels that work with light from either side are preferred for this use.

conradev3y ago

If it’s not hardware (panels, inverters, brackets, etc) it is considered a soft cost.

NREL’s model puts soft costs at 44% for a 100MW fixed-tilt utility-scale plant in 2021:

https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/80694.pdf

The percentage goes up as the installation size goes down, but it is not 70%

sbierwagen3y ago

>low altitude

Low latitude?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse