The example he cites is from a tweet made by a guild of writers for the Oxford University Press.

> We, the members of the OUP USA Guild, are calling upon our colleagues and authors to take a stand against the upcoming publication of “Gender-Critical Feminism”. Sign the petition below (OUP employees and authors only).

Yeah, that's not a "ban", and "gender critical feminism" = TERFs. Ie, "people who think trans women are faking it so they can rape women and children in bathrooms or 'cheat' 'the system'"

Remind me which side thinks businesses have a constitutional right to refuse to serve people if it violates their "beliefs"...yet finds it unacceptable that unionized workers are objecting to publishing of research on a subject?

Also, remind me which side is boycotting a major entertainment company...because said company's CEO voiced displeasure...at a bill that bans any language referencing non-straight gender orientations?

That reads like those "UI vs UX" images where the creator just takes 2 random photos and sticks them next to each other—while simultaneously being deeply ignorant of what’s going on in the country right now.

Paul Graham's tweet with zero corroborating evidence other than "believe me I'm paul graham" is not a source.