undefined | Better HN

0 pointsgreedo4y ago0 comments

Explain how the Bayraktar has been very effective targeting SAM systems? SAMs designed to destroy aircraft in this size range, and operating altitude?

Systems like TOR/Tunguska/Buk should be easily capable of detecting the Bayraktar and destroying it. It's not like Russia didn't see how it worked in the Armenian/Azerbaijan conflict. They knew Ukraine had Bayraktar, but seemed completely unprepared to deal with it.

0 comments

simonh4y ago

Frankly they seemed unprepared to deal with anything. I think it’s another case where half of them thought they were going on a training exercise, and the rest thought it would be over in 72 hours.

The Ukrainians have all the same SAM systems the Russians do, so are super familiar with their limitations. They’re also many times more motivated.

mrtksn4y ago

One explanation is that the Bayraktar TB2 drones are too small and too slow to be targeted by systems designed to shoot on fighter jets.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

simonh4y ago

Frankly they seemed unprepared to deal with anything. I think it’s another case where half of them thought they were going on a training exercise, and the rest thought it would be over in 72 hours.

The Ukrainians have all the same SAM systems the Russians do, so are super familiar with their limitations. They’re also many times more motivated.

mrtksn4y ago

One explanation is that the Bayraktar TB2 drones are too small and too slow to be targeted by systems designed to shoot on fighter jets.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse