With Java 17, the gap is narrowing between Kotlin and Java. Kotlin has still unique features that I love (extension methods for instance), but the big one is nullability. You can use @Nullable/@NotNull annotations in Java but I largely prefer having nullability backed in types with Kotlin. Some people say nullability is not a problem: with 30 developers of various quality, I can ensure it is a problem. I don’t see Java addressing nullability in a better way in the near future, so I’m going to stick with Kotlin.
Furthermore, SonarQube doesn't let you automatically enable e-mail notifications for everyone: https://docs.sonarqube.org/latest/instance-administration/no...
> Only users who subscribe themselves will get notifications. With only one exception, there is no admin functionality to proactively subscribe another user. If you believe a user should be receiving notifications, then it's time to practice the gentle art of persuasion.
So everyone is also free to ignore the e-mails that they may or may not receive. This isn't made any easier by the default quality profiles being problematic to deal with, e.g. SonarQube asking you to add HTML tags which would break XHTML templating in certain frameworks, such as PrimeFaces, thus having to spend a lot of time marking stuff as false positives, since that actual check might be sometimes useful except for your particular circumstances, of which it is not aware.
So perhaps it's a good idea to indeed utilize a language or another integrated solution (versioned/shared IDE code style preferences are also pretty cool), since other solutions, although workable with a bit of effort, wouldn't necessarily thrive in all environments. Unless, of course, you want to find a different environment, but that's a slightly different discussion.
The (not) nullability story is much better in Kotlin.
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentatio...
As someone who moved from Java to C# around 2013, I always felt that C# was close to Java but with less bad parts and more good parts. Looks like Java's now borrowing a lot of the nicer features which is good to see.
There are still so many nice exclusive features in C# that I definitely wouldn't want to go back to Java any time soon though (properties, powerful tuples, null coalescing, interpolated strings, ...).
Java needed string interpolation forever before _finally_ getting something. There are parts of C# that I think are going to look like a good idea at the time, but turned out not so great. Extension methods is one, and async/await is another. In fact, if Project Loom ever, finally, actually ships it'll make the whole c# code colouring thing look like the abomination that it is.
Java attributes and compiler plugins took their inspiration from .NET early version.
Default method interfaces in C# come from Java, LINQ vs streams, JIT / PGO caches,...
That is why it is still relatively easy to do consulting across both platforms.
