Non-curved 60Hz monitors are a thing of the past they should be relegated to monitors that cost 200$.

That was an easy comment to make! Do you realize that other peoples have different preferences than you do and they are equally valid.

Maybe it should be, but it’s not actually a thing of the past. I would bet hard cash that a higher number of recently released expensive monitors ($1000+) don’t have retina than those that did. There is still a massive market for people willing to make the trade off in another direction (like higher refresh rate or going ultrawide) rather than retina.

Obviously it’d be amazing if what you said is true, because both retina and HRR are very nice to have

Just like non-VRR is a thing of the past, non-120+Hz is a thing of the past, etc.

I can claim equally without evidence that non-120+Hz is a thing of the past.

There are so many other dimensions that can be more important. 110 dpi is fine for me now - my next upgrade will focus on contrast and black level instead.