You have a clear motivated reasoning bias (crypto = bad and useless) paired without understanding the basics of how crypto works.

You don’t have conversations with people, you just ignore details that disagree with your pre-existing conclusion and focus on digressions you think prove your point (typically against a strawman argument I’m not making).

Your submissions betray this bias too. Crypto (and conversation) is more interesting when considering the nuanced bits even if it may disagree with “your side”.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PeSzc9JTBxhaYRp9b/policy-deb...

You’re right about one thing though, the evidence is there for people to see.