https://twitter.com/flightradar24/status/1505863117343014916
Of course really trying to speculate at this early stage on limited data is pointless. We really need to wait for some hard information to come out of the crash investigation.
This "recovery" would be short, as their air speed slowed, lift decreased, and they then resumed their downward trajectory.
"Plane carrying 132 people crashes in Guangxi hills" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30754868
Not trying to speculate, only wondering if the same model of plane.
There was an air crash episode on a crash from the 80s but other than that I can’t think of another complete nose dive crash.
Full blown nose down is rare unless controlled flight into terrain. The obvious armchair speculation I would make here is that a total separation of the tailplane / stabilator or empennage of the aircraft could cause something approximating that -- the tailplane provides negative lift and without it the aircraft would pitch up until it stalled, and then a series of exponentially growing oscillations would likewise result.
It's far better to wait for the NTSB accident report and deliver sympathy and aid to those affected, however -- we don't have the facts and I am sure that they will be determined in the fullness of time.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_232 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_Baghdad_DHL_attempted_sho...