For example, Russia might say "we will sell you oil at 10% below market rate for the next 50 years if you join the war on our side".
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/exclusive-russia-...
This is not a tough one to figure out.
Also, Russia could offer land. Or exclusivity rights to resources.
Putin made a grave mistake and cannot win without China’s direct assistance.
Putin’s actions have strengthened US stature and position globally, as well as illustrating the importance of NATO. This presumably is exactly the opposite of what Putin desired.
China could gain influence and power by helping Russia, but at the cost of international relations. More importantly, it would still be a gamble.
Without China’s help, Putin will fail one way or another.
China could instead stand with the rest of the world. This would more quickly end the current conflict, and it would make China a more significant international partner. This is the better option.
China build the biggest Navy in the world and for sure not for beautiful parades. To achieve their objectives and keep the current Communist elite in power making money, ( they are not different from the Oligarchs) they need Russia natural resources and a fellow authoritarian in power. China will support Russia.
With Xi in power, I don't feel that they play the long game anymore, or invading Taiwan in the near future wouldn't be in the works. That was only true when it was rule by committee, which is no longer the case. Maybe if Jiang Zemin is ever successful in his assassination attempts there's a chance for China to revert back to CCP committee style rule but I still have doubts. Jiang would still make a better leader than Xi though.
The Partners above represent 53% of China exports and Russia only 1,9%.
Even taking into account that other strategic considerations will of course guide China decisions, it is once more, another major strategic error on the part of the EU and the US not to use this as leverage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_pa...
> As a result, China will surely win widespread international praise for maintaining world peace, which may help China prevent isolation but also find an opportunity to improve its relations with the United States and the West.
Believing PRC should (and can) improve relations with US is medically retarded at this point. Let alone "surely win international praise". And to do so freely without any concessions in return knowing full well a contained RU means PRC is next on the chopping block. If West want PRC's help, start by lifting tariffs, removing sanctions, selling EUV machines, stop arming TW. The fact that US has continued pressure on PRC over TW, EU still jerks about IndoPac, while having talks with sanctioned countries like VZ to release oil means there's no point adopting "mainstream" / west position that's actually not mainstream considering more than half world's population are sitting out (including most of ASEAN). Currently PRC has no interest picking sides, and if it had to, it would pick turning east Europe into a prolonged quagmire behind the scenes because EU foreign policy was shifting anti PRC pre UKR anyway. If UKR is the start of a "world [that] is undergoing profound changes unseen in a century", PRC would opt for changes that makes LIO weaker not stronger.
This isn't true given what's on state media. It's like saying the US is neutral. I don't believe there are any neutral sides at this point if we're being honest.
>1 hour
TL;DR a delicate balance between supporting its junior partner and its own interests
Pretty much what he pulled off in Chechnya, North Ossetia, Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk.
Here we see the Chinese seeing the West has firmly turned against Putin and that China will be better off disavowing themselves from Putin.
The article impresses me as a dispassionate summary of the possible outcomes.
4+4 = 8
"4. China will become more isolated under the established framework. For the above reasons, if China does not take proactive measures to respond, it will encounter further containment from the US and the West."
"4. China should prevent the outbreak of world wars and nuclear wars and make irreplaceable contributions to world peace. "
I think it is in China's best interests to set Putin aside and let peace and trade flow again. Ukraine goes free and democratic and Russian can make it's own way.