Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
BalinKing
4y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
I feel like this is probably a violation? I've edited out the first-person language and added a reference to the Wired article.
0 comments
3 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
ushakov
4y ago
· 2 in thread
also he has some personal comment in the last section
somebody gotta explain him Wikipedia ain't a personal blog
tux3
4y ago
Ironically, had he published on his personal blog under his name and credentials, it could have been accepted as a reliable source.
(Though a Wired article is even better)
tgsovlerkhgsel
4y ago
Wikipedia insists on secondary sources. Primary sources are not considered acceptable IIRC.
2 more replies
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse