Well, people are facing repercussions for viewing pro-Ukraine material. There's no immunity from repercussions, right?

(Or more precisely, people are facing repercussions for violating the algorithms that Google chose. But they're still repercussions.)

The point is that there's a double standard. If social media censors someone you hate, it's "there's no freedom from repercussions" or "they're a private group so they can ban anyone they want" or "their system, their rules". If they censor someone you like, this suddenly changes to "nobody is entitled to a business model" and "Youtube has no right to operate like that".