undefined | Better HN

0 pointsironmagma4y ago0 comments

Say what you will about ActiveX, but it allowed a much more native feel for web pages.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

jraph4y ago· 2 in thread

Native feel is not wanted (anymore). Branded appearance is.

(and I think this is unfortunate. I wish developers didn't attempt to replace my browser's perfectly fine-looking, accessible checkboxes by their own often ugly custom implementations for instance. And I'm not hating on web devs, I'm one of them)

XUL [1] seemed like a good idea as a basis for building native-looking web applications. It's too bad it has been abandoned.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XUL

ironmagmaOP4y ago

I think both are wanted. People like it when they have the usability and familiarity of native widgets, but it’s nice when they also have theming and personality. A good example is TweetBot, which is a normal iOS app except it’s not, or OmniFocus which does things in a native way except everything is purple.

MaxBarraclough4y ago

> XUL seemed like a good idea as a basis for building native-looking web applications. It's too bad it has been abandoned.

Didn't XUL do roughly what React Native, and other similar frameworks, do today?

edit I see that XUL did its own rendering rather than using native widgets, but the overall goal seems about the same.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse