You have some valid critiques about the post, but the big point that you didn't answer in this is the idea that tether is more or less "unbacked" and with significantly less regulation that doesn't have even the (often critiqued) limits set forward in Basel II/III. USD is backed by the full weight of the US government, Tether is backed by a bank account with unknown things in it.
The fact that the market isn't totally efficient doing USD/BTC transactions directly and the fact that Tether is clearly far more risky than USD kinda indicates something is up. Who knows, they could be playing it safe and be well capitalized, but if they're not, it becomes a very similar situation to when Soros made a mint "breaking" the Pound.