IPV4 addresses are scarce due to lack of foresight and useful.
NFTs are scarce by design and useless.
So, I know of one real-world usecase that's not useless: Some startups have begun legally selling properties (homes, ranches, plots) via NFTs.
Real estate on the blockchain is my favourite bad blockchain idea because if someone loses access to their wallet they presumably lose the ability to ever sell their house.
There are a few of these in England, Chancel Repair Liability is the most famous. In theory you could be forced to pay for repairs to a nearby church you never visit and have no interest in, on account of land you own was historically liable for such repairs and this was never cancelled. A real person, this century, had to pay about £350 000 as a result, so that's not inconsequential (although the circumstances were pretty unusual). But that's scary enough that a real estate lawyer might argue they're not sure the property you want to buy is unaffected, you should take out Insurance against the liability, conveniently sold by another lawyer.
The government tried to "fix" this, but the problem with lawyers is, obviously no fix will be good enough to prevent lawyers saying what if the fix didn't work, so chances are you get persuaded to buy insurance even though the liability probably no longer exists because hey, if I'm wrong I'm not going to pay £350 000 so...
Fifty years from now, if the fact there's "an NFT on the blockchain" for a property you want to buy is even something anybody knows about, your lawyer will know, and they'll tell you that another lawyer offers $1000 insurance, buy that and if "the blockchain" ever tries to sue you and take the property back they'll have your back...
Some are covered in this article: https://archive.is/k3w7F
> ...if someone loses access to their wallet they presumably lose the ability to ever sell their house.
It is software at the end of the day and seems like there is already a solution for it: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Multi-signature
That's rich