undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmlac4y ago0 comments

I think about stagnating innovation, and think that Zoom/Webex focus tends to keep things in the status quo.

I’ve just got a feeling that there will be some hidden cost to innovation at large companies (less chance encounters) and a hit to culture (building a good remote culture is really hard) over time. These are not easily quantified, and I’m not sure the costs outweigh the benefits of a remote work force (health and safety, candidate pool, retention, flexibility, etc.).

But it may be a trend in 5-10 years where companies with an in-person focus start eroding market share of remote-first established companies.

0 comments

pm904y ago

I think this is kinda wishful thinking, tbh.

The labor market was pretty tight before the pandemic and has just become even tighter. Americans are less supportive of permissive immigration policies, birth rates are falling precipitously which means there is no end in sight. So companies which figure out how to do remote right (rather than accept is as a temporary adjustments) will have the edge as they can access a broader labor market (entire NA plus EU, maybe others if they can figure out time zones and outsourcing).

tessierashpool4y ago

if you switch to Zoom, you don’t need a building. this is an intense and dramatic change to the overhead of a business.

your employees might not need a car any more, either. the number one depreciating “asset” in the average person’s life becomes optional.

this innovation’s been around in tech for decades, and people have started billion-dollar companies this way. (for example, GitHub was profitable for years before it set up its first physical office.) but it’s not just tech now; it’s finally going mainstream.

this is a very big deal.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse