undefined | Better HN

0 pointspessimizer4y ago0 comments

> AT&T's threat assessment of T-Mobile was correct at the time.

I think that assessment was obvious to everyone at the time. The question is whether buying out competitors is good for the public.

Of course, the cash was a penalty for not being able to pull off the merger; if the cash was critical for T-Mobile to become the threat it has been, the outcome is ironic.

0 comments

ece4y ago

I don't know what the breakup cash might have amounted to, but the AT&T roaming agreement was for 7 years, and it's only recently with n41/n71 that T-Mobile has done any better.

The equivalent for this merger would be something like Minecraft and Bethesda games on the A-B launcher for 7 years. Huge giveaway by AT&T I think, as foolish as it might have been for them to think the merger would actually go through; having at-least 4 major carriers was policy at the time and still is (Dish's spectrum hoarding notwithstanding).

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointspessimizer4y ago0 comments

> AT&T's threat assessment of T-Mobile was correct at the time.

I think that assessment was obvious to everyone at the time. The question is whether buying out competitors is good for the public.

Of course, the cash was a penalty for not being able to pull off the merger; if the cash was critical for T-Mobile to become the threat it has been, the outcome is ironic.

0 comments

ece4y ago

I don't know what the breakup cash might have amounted to, but the AT&T roaming agreement was for 7 years, and it's only recently with n41/n71 that T-Mobile has done any better.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse