Skip to content
Better HN
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Search
⌘K
undefined | Better HN
0 points
sbarre
4y ago
0 comments
Share
This can't be permanent. I bet this is to keep the markets happy in the short term while this gets absorbed, and then Kotick will "retire" at some point in the next year.
0 comments
default
newest
oldest
joaodlf
4y ago
I'd buy shares right now if they had gotten rid of Kotick.
techdragon
4y ago
Even though it would cost an additional $275 ish million?
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse