undefined | Better HN

0 pointsSideburnsOfDoom4y ago0 comments

Not "literally Hitler" and "with no justification".

So, a bad faith attack.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

smsm424y ago· 2 in thread

Yes "literally Hitler" - which you yourself admitted after some insistent prodding. And yes "no justification" - nothing in the article justified going strait into Nazi accusations.

And I don't think a person who thinks it's ok to skirt the rules every time he wants should talk too much about "bad faith". But of course it all fits into the same "it's OK when I do it" mold, doesn't it?

SideburnsOfDoomOP4y ago

> which you yourself admitted after some insistent prodding.

Rubbish. After repeated attempts to put words in my mouth, which I did not rise to, you just declare the result anyway and launch into the argument anyway. It's not going to uncover any truth is it, just divert attention.

Have a nice day!

smsm424y ago

You've risen to (or rather, descended to) mentioning Godwin's law - which specifically implies Nazi & Hitler comparisons, and "white nationalist and or Fascist". That's plenty enough. I know what you meant, you know what you meant, everybody knows what you meant. Own up to it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse