undefined | Better HN

0 pointsflipbrad4y ago0 comments

Look again at the nature of the offence - it's not about consentless tracking (any tracking here, using cookies, was opt in). Plus, users that were concerned enough could quite easily refuse; they just couldn't do it with a single click. How much do you think they actually suffered? How big of a fine do you think something like this actually deserves (given we're just talking about French users here, not EU or global)?

0 comments

JCWasmx864y ago

Given Google made 17 Billion dollar in Q1 2021 [0] in Europe/Africa/Middle East, I would say that around 2 Billion dollar would be more appropriate.

Facebook made 6.5 Billion dollar in Q1 2021 [1] in Europe, so maybe around 1-1.5 Billion dollar.

[0] https://businessquant.com/google-revenue-by-region (Didn't find a better source or one that lists the revenue for France only)

[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/223279/facebooks-quarter...

Edit: I tested the banners:

Facebook: "More Options" -> "Allow only essential cookies" (1 click more than necessary)

Google: "Anpassen" -> Switch off "Suchanpassung" -> Switch off "Youtube-Verlauf" -> Switch off "Personalisierte Werbung" -> "Bestätigen" and then there are 3 seconds of delay with progress bar. (4 clicks more than necessary + delay). This delay does not occur, if I simply press "Accept all"

flipbradOP4y ago

2 billion dollars just in respect of French users having to wait a few seconds and do a few clicks?

thrwyoilarticle4y ago

Could we not be disingenuous? If the delay was meaningless, it wouldn't exist. There is a clear intention by these companies to bore or confuse people into signing their rights away. Consider how many lawyers are on payroll or retention at these companies who are aware of the requirements of the law, then consider that G/FB made a cynical, calculated decision to ignore it.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse