But there's something to be said for the math example, and I know I'm pedandic, but 2+2=17 is probably more wrong than 2+2=purple.. There's going to be no way to explain how you arrive at 17.. You can't argue it.. You could argue however that, "Oh, purple, sorry, well, four always tasted like purple to me, so that's the one I jotted down in a rush"
> You can't argue it
I'll argue it. :) If you take the 7 and lower the top line, and take the 1 and make is smaller and place it on top of the line to the left, you have a 4.
The Relativity of Wrong (1989) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24055125 - Aug 2020 (2 comments)
The Relativity of Wrong (1989) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17818069 - Aug 2018 (11 comments)
The Relativity of Wrong (1989) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13082585 - Dec 2016 (16 comments)
The Relativity of Wrong by Isaac Asimov (1989) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11654774 - May 2016 (60 comments)
Isaac Asimov: The Relativity of Wrong (1989) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9629797 - May 2015 (138 comments)
Isaac Asimov - The Relativity of Wrong (1989) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1147968 - Feb 2010 (32 comments)