I wouldn’t be surprised about the opportunistic chances to push an ideology taken by supposedly apolitical orgs. There are examples all over even if you don’t want to see it.
So I was willing to believe that MW made a small addendum to their previous definition of antivaxxer. Despite it being a cheap and dirty abuse of their institution.
But no. They removed it entirely and replaced it with exactly what you said. Wtf.
Opposing a vaccine mandate for completely precedent and objectifiable legal reasons “now makes” you an antivaxxer huh?
Well… I’m new to the club apparently, where do I pick up my Karen haircut and homeopathic treatments?
No comments yet.
