undefined | Better HN

0 pointshbbio4y ago0 comments

It's not negativity. You wrote an article showing you clearly don't understand at all what are the stakes or what you are doing.

What you did is a basic setup which was covered in O'Reilly's TCP/IP book back in 1996. World has changed since.

Please learn from the community here.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

acallaghan4y ago· 2 in thread

Docker, cloud volumes, SpamAssassin, Dovecot, ClamAV, fail2ban, DKIM, DMARC. Ask what these are to someone in 1996 and see what you’d get back. The article covered setting all of these up

However my main objection to the OC was attacks on my professionalism. Unless you’re going to defend that, I don’t really care

linza4y ago

I think the author and submitter got exactly what they asked for by posting something to HN that is by their own admission low-effort as it took only 30 minutes to knock it out. Many of the commenters call this out, since in their opinion the content does not hold up to what the headline promises.

Also, one aspect of professionalism is also to be thankful for the feedback rather than trying to interpret it as attacks.

acallaghan4y ago

I am the author.

> if I had any private data hosted by the author, I would be worried now.

Is an attack on me personally, nothing about the article. The article also took much longer than 30 minutes to 'knock out' - more like 3 hours all in all

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse