I suppose you could make the argument that this will enable Socialcam to grow more quickly and thus drive higher value for everyone, but it seems like quite a high risk.
The investors in Justin.tv now own a smaller share (or none) of SocialCam, right? How is this allowed (without approval)? And who would approve it if growth is good?
I like the analogy that having a business with multiple very different businesses is like a multi-front war.
Seems like they have the resources for it and the drive and ambition.