Bitcoin people believe it is a moral good (myself included), and have extremely strong arguments in favor of that view, which are rooted in morality and economics. Thus, when you make a snide anti-bitcoin remark without actual content, you come across as trying to invalidate bitcoin through mere peer pressure, which we all know is juvenile.

It's like Trump voters who criticize "libtards." We all know it's not a valid way to discuss something.

In fact, the expansion of the fiat money supply enriches the wealthy through the Cantillon effect. Then, because the value of money is going down, they pile into assets like housing. For instance, the US is becoming a nation of renters due to this effect. The stock market is similarly distorted. We need bitcoin because we need an objective form of money. That would allow stocks and houses to stop being stores of wealth and reflect their true economic value, which would be a huge boon to everybody.

I'm guessing the energy thing is what you think your anti-bitcoin argument would be. Bitcoin mining is also such an efficient market that in the long run, only the most efficient forms of energy--such as nuclear and geothermal--will be viable for it. Bitcoin is already helping to advance "green" energy. This is abundantly clear to people involved in the mining industry.