> Disney creates works billions of people want to see.
Yup!
> and they have governments around the world enforce the ownership rights.
This is one of the strongest selling points of crypto for its supporters; that, when it makes sense, floaty, legal ownership rights can be replaced with hard cryptography. It doesn't make sense for every good, or even every digital good.
> Nobody wants the piece of art associated with your NFT’s
Speaking wholesale for seven billion human beings, I see.
> And is there even any legally framework for the ownership of NFT’s or is it just something a weird club of people says is so?
Ideally, theoretically; its not a legal framework, its a cryptographic framework. The minting address of the original artist would be publicly known, and is encoded into the chain of custody for every NFT.
This is the jump that many detractors don't make. Its not the blockchain that prescribes authenticity to the NFT; the chain VALIDATES authenticity, it doesn't prescribe it. Its not OpenSea (though they can definitely make it all more user friendly). Its the chain of custody and the address of the original minter.
